Posted  by 

Micro Cracks In Concrete

  1. Types Of Concrete Cracks
  2. Repairing Cracks In Concrete
  3. Causes Of Micro Cracks In Concrete

Repairing cracks in concrete is not as difficult as it might seem to someone who has never done it before. It basically involves cleaning out the cracks, then using either a concrete patching compound or concrete caulk to fill the space. For larger cracks, a little sand can be added before the patching compound is used. After the cracks have been filled, they should be allowed to dry completely. For concrete that is heavily damaged, or if the cracks appear in the foundation of your home or another building, it probably is best to use a professional concrete repair service.

Repair Quickly

When concrete is first placed, moisture will evaporate from the surface faster than within the mass of the concrete. As the surface begins to cure faster than the concrete below the surface, tensile stresses build up and shallow microscopic cracks develop in random directions. Crack the surface concrete as a result of this uncontrolled temperature difference across the cross section. In most cases thermal cracking occurs at early ages. In rarer instances thermal cracking can occur when concrete surfaces are ex-posed to extreme temperature rapidly. Concrete members will expand and contract when exposed. Jun 17, 2014  A crack’s environmental conditions influence the extent to which it affects its structure’s integrity. Greater exposure to aggressive conditions increases the possibility of structural instability. Cracks’ sizes range from micro-cracks that expose the concrete to efflorescence to larger cracks caused by external loading conditions. A crack’s environmental conditions influence the extent to which it affects its structure’s integrity. Greater exposure to aggressive conditions increases the possibility of structural instability. Cracks’ sizes range from micro-cracks that expose the concrete to efflorescence to larger cracks caused by external loading conditions.

Home ownership comes with both benefits and responsibilities, and one of those responsibilities is to maintain the concrete or cement-paved areas around your home. It is best to perform the repairs as soon as you see any cracks in concrete on your property, for a variety of reasons. Cracks are easier to repair while they are still small. Safety is another reason to get started right away; homeowners are responsible for any injuries that occur on their property, and large cracks could cause someone to trip and fall. Cracked concrete can also be unattractive, and you likely will want to protect the looks and value of your home.

A mcrocrack is a type of material damage consisting of cracks small enough to require magnification to observe. A microcrack is an indication of material failure that can ultimately lead to complete failure. It may occur on a coating during the application or drying process, or during load strain of a coating or material. Microsynthetic Fibers. Fibermesh® 150F micro fiber is the optimized balance of the best type of fiber and the number of fibers for resistance to explosive spalling. Incorporating a relatively small amount of Fibermesh® 150F fiber provides a 3 dimensional protection system throughout the concrete and ONLY when there is a fire. If a few random cracks like that and you know that it was reinforced, I would have him (in lieu of tearing out and replacing now) give you an extended warranty for say 6-12 months against further cracking (and keep photos of current cracking), and he fills the current cracks - if all that small probably with concrete caulk, which can be colored.

(Redirected from Concrete Fracture Analysis)


Concrete is widely used construction material all over the world. It is composed of aggregate, cement and water. Composition of concrete varies to suit for different applications desired. Even size of the aggregate can influence mechanical properties of concrete to a great extent.

  • 1Peculiarities of Concrete
  • 2LEFM and Concrete
  • 3Fracture mechanics of concrete
  • 4Computational models for fracture analysis

Peculiarities of Concrete[edit]

Response to tensile and compressive loading[edit]

Concrete is strong in compression but weak in tension. When tensile loads are applied, concrete undergoes fracture easily. The reason behind this phenomenon can be explained as follows. The aggregates in concrete are capable of taking compressive stresses so that concrete withstands compressive loading. But during tensile loading cracks are formed which separates the cement particles which hold the aggregates together. This separation of cement particles causes the entire structure to fail as crack propagates. This problem in concrete is resolved by the introduction of reinforcing components such as metallic bars, ceramic fibres etc. These components act as a skeleton of the entire structure and are capable of holding aggregates under tensile loading. This is known as Reinforcement of Concrete.

Material Properties[edit]

Concrete may be referred to as a brittle material. This is because concrete's behaviour under loading is completely different from that of ductile materials like steel. But actually concrete differs from ideal brittle materials in many aspects. In modern fracture mechanics concrete is considered as a quasi-brittle material.[1] Quasi-brittle materials possess considerable hardness which is similar to ceramic hardness, so often it is called ceramic hardness. The reason for ceramic hardness can be explained on the basis of sub‑critical cracking that happens during loading of concrete. Sub‑critical cracking in concrete which precedes ultimate failure, results in non‑linear Stress‑Strain response and R‑curve behaviour. So concrete obtains hardness from subcritical failure.[2]Also concrete has a heterogeneous structure due to uneven composition of ingredients in it. This also complicates the analysis of concrete by producing misleading results.

LEFM and Concrete[edit]

Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics yields reliable results in the field of ductile materials like steel. Most of the experiments and theories in fracture mechanics are formulated taking ductile materials as object of interest. But if we compare the salient features in LEFM with results derived from the testing of concrete, we may find it irrelevant and sometimes trivial. For example, LEFM permits infinite stress at crack tip. This makes no sense in real analysis of concrete where the stress at crack tip is fixed. And LEFM fails to calculate stress at crack tip precisely. So we need some other ways to find out what is stress at crack tip and distribution stress near crack tip.

LEFM cannot answer many phenomenon exhibited by concrete. Some examples are

  • Size Effect (some properties are strongly dependent on size of specimen selected).
  • Unobjectivity of Finite Element analysis due to mesh size dependence.
  • Concept of Fracture energy or Crack energy is not known in LEFM.
  • Inability to explain strain softening or quasi softening in concrete.

Fracture Process Zone (FPZ) in concrete[edit]

In LEFMPA, during cracking, no specific region is mentioned in between the area which is cracked and that which is not. But it is evident that in concrete, there is some intermediate space between cracked and uncracked portion. This region is defined as the Fracture Process Zone (FPZ). FPZ consists of micro cracks which are minute individual cracks situated nearer to crack tip. As the crack propagates these micro cracks merge and becomes a single structure to give continuity to the already existing crack. So indeed, FPZ acts as a bridging zone between cracked region and uncracked region. Analysis of this zone deserves special notice because it is very helpful to predict the propagation of crack and ultimate failure in concrete.In steel (ductile) FPZ is very small and therefore strain hardening dominates over strain softening. Also due to small FPZ, crack tip can easily be distinguished from uncracked metal. And in ductile materials FPZ is a yielding zone.

When we consider FPZ in concrete, we find that FPZ is sufficiently large and contains micro cracks. And cohesive pressure still remains in the region. So strain softening is prevalent in this region. Due to the presence of comparatively large FPZ, locating a precise crack tip is not possible in concrete.

ft{displaystyle f_{t}} = Ultimate strength
w{displaystyle w} = crack width
Area under the curve = Fracture Energy

Pre-peak and post-peak response of steel and concrete[edit]

If we plot stress (Pascal) vs. strain (percentage deformation) characteristics of a material, the maximum stress up to which the material can be loaded is known as peak value (ft{displaystyle f_{t}}). The behaviour of concrete and steel can be compared to understand the difference in their fracture characteristics.For this a strain controlled loading of un-notched specimen of each materials can be done. From the observations we can draw these conclusions:[3]

Pre-peak

  1. Steel exhibits linear elastic response up to yield stress and strain approximately 0.1%. After that it undergoes plastic deformation due internal dislocations up to a strain corresponding to 25%.
  2. Concrete exhibits linear response to a stress value: 0.6 ft{displaystyle f_{t}} (60% of peak stress), then after internal micro‑cracking induces plastic response up to peak stress value (ft{displaystyle f_{t}}). This peak value is observed at a strain of approximately 0.01%.

Post-peak

  1. Metals behaviour after peak value of stress is still a dilemma to scientists. After this peak value necking complicates the analysis and it is of no practical usefulness.
  2. In post peak zone concrete exhibits additional strains. We can observe a localized crack and elastic unloading in this region. Also a strain cannot be properly defined at the crack, we may prefer a stress crack opening displacement (σ-COD) model for the purpose of analysis.

Fracture mechanics of concrete[edit]

Concept of fracture energy[edit]

Fracture energy is defined as the energy required to open unit area of crack surface. It is a material property and does not depend on size of structure. This can be well understood from the definition that it is defined for a unit area and thus influence of size is removed.

Fracture energy can be expressed as the sum of surface creation energy and surface separation energy. Fracture energy found to be increasing as we approach crack tip.

Fracture energy is a function of displacement and not strain. Fracture energy deserves prime role in determining ultimate stress at crack tip.

Mesh Size Dependence[edit]

In Finite Element Method analysis of concrete, if mesh size is varied, then entire result varies according to it. This is called mesh size dependence. If mesh size is higher, then the structure can withstand more stress. But such results obtained from FEM analysis contradict real case.

Size effect[edit]

In classical Fracture Mechanics, critical stress value is considered as a material property. So it is same for a particular material of any shape and size. But in practice, it is observed that, in some materials like plain concrete size has a strong influence on critical stress value.[4] So fracture mechanics of concrete consider critical stress value a material property as well as a size dependent parameter.

Bažant's size effect relation[edit]

σ{displaystyle sigma }=τ{displaystyle tau }/√(1+{d{displaystyle d}/λ{displaystyle lambda }δ{displaystyle delta }})[4][5]

where

σ{displaystyle sigma }= Critical stress
τ{displaystyle tau } = tensile strength
d{displaystyle d} = size of specimen
λ{displaystyle lambda } = empirical constant
δ{displaystyle delta } = maximum aggregate size

This clearly proves that material size and even the component size like aggregate size can influence cracking of concrete.

Computational models for fracture analysis[edit]

Because of the heterogeneous nature of concrete, it responds to already existing crack testing models 'anomaly'. And it is evident that alteration of existing models was required to answer the unique fracture mechanics characteristics of concrete.

Earlier models[edit]

Dugdale Model
Major assumptions of this model were:
  • A plastic zone is present near the crack tip.
  • Critical stress value is a constant and it is equal to yield stress across the crack.
Barenblatt Model
  • A plastic zone is present near the crack tip.
  • Critical stress value is varying along with deformation produced.

The main drawback of both these models was negligence of concept of fracture energy.[6]

Fictitious crack model or Hillerborg model[edit]

The model proposed by Hillerborg in 1976, was the first model to analyse concrete fracture making use of the fracture energy concept. In this model, Hillerborg describes two crack regions namely,

  • True or physical crack
  • Fictitious crack or fracture process zone (FPZ)[3]
True crack region
is the outer most part where cracking process is completed and no stresses can be propagated through this zone. COD is comparatively high and more or less constant.
In this region we have both stress discontinuity and displacement discontinuity.
Fracture process zone
situated just interior to the True crack region where crack is initiating and propagating.

In this zone at crack tip, we have peak stress = tensile strength of concrete.[7]

Along the FPZ stress is continuous and displacement is discontinuous.

Crack propagation in FPZ starts when critical stress is equal to tensile strength of concrete and as crack starts propagating, stress does not become zero. Using the plot of fracture energy versus crack width, we can calculate critical stress at any point including crack tip. So one of the major drawbacks of LEFM is overcome using fracture energy approach. Direction of crack propagation can also be determined by identifying the direction of maximum energy release rate.

Concept of characteristic length
Hillerborg defined a parameter called Hillerborg characteristic length(l{displaystyle l}) which is numerically expressed as,
l=EGσ2{displaystyle l={frac {EG}{sigma ^{2}}}}[8]

where

Becker cpa review download. Becker CPA Review Becker Bundle CPA Review Product Overview Becker CPA Review has “A premium study package. All the essentials, plus extra practicing and a thorough review, for as long as you need it.”. Simply download the app and enter your Becker course login credentials to get started. Available for Apple® and Android™ tablets and smartphones, Becker’s CPA Exam Review mobile app makes it easy for you to study for the CPA Exam wherever and whenever you have a few minutes of downtime. Download Becker’s Accounting for Empires game available on the app store to conquer the upcoming CPA Exam. Play with others as you grow your empire while completing quizzes to gain resources and knowledge. With Becker’s CPA Exam Review app, you can study at your own pace no matter where you are or when you want to study. Becker understands preparing for the CPA Exam requires an enormous investment of time and energy. Our CPA Exam Review course focuses on important higher-order cognitive skills including analysis and evaluation, and mirrors the CPA Exam. Experience Becker’s course with a complimentary 21-day demo.

l{displaystyle l}= characteristic length
E{displaystyle E}= Young's Modulus
G{displaystyle G} = fracture energy
σ{displaystyle sigma } = critical stress value

Hillerborg characteristic length can be used to predict brittleness of a material. As magnitude of characteristic length decreases brittle nature dominates and vice versa.

Crack band model[edit]

Proposed by Bazant and Oh in 1983, this theory can well attribute materials whose homogeneous nature changes over a certain range randomly. So we select any particular more or less homogeneous volume for the purpose of analysis. Hence we can determine the stresses and strains. The size of this region should be several times that of maximum aggregate. Otherwise the data obtained will be of no physical significance.Fracture Process Zone is modelled with bands of smeared crack.[8] And to overcome the Finite Element Method unobjectivity, we use cracking criterion of fracture energy.

Crack width is estimated as the product of crack band width and element strain. In finite element analysis, the crack band width is the element size of fracture process path.

References[edit]

Types Of Concrete Cracks

  1. ^Fracture Mechanics, Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edition by T.L.Anderson
  2. ^Fracture Mechanics by Gross Dietmar and Thomas Seelig
  3. ^ abLecture Notes in Fracture Mechanics by Victor E. Saouma
  4. ^ abBažant, Z.P., and Planas, J. (1998). Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
  5. ^Bažant, Z. P., and Pang, S.-D. (2006) “Mechanics based statistics of failure risk of quasibrittle structures and size effect on safety factors.” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci., USA 103 (25), pp. 9434–9439
  6. ^Concrete Fracture Models: Testing and Practices by Zdenek P Bažant
  7. ^Bažant, Z. P. (2004) “Scaling theory of quaisbrittle structural failure.” Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci., USA 101 (37), 13397-13399
  8. ^ ab'Fracture Mechanics for Structural Concrete'(PDF). Retrieved 13 April 2013.
Micro concrete products

Repairing Cracks In Concrete

See also[edit]

Causes Of Micro Cracks In Concrete

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concrete_fracture_analysis&oldid=845835276'